Czarnecki & Taylor PLLC represents people challenging Michigan criminal convictions and sentences through careful investigation, detailed record review, and focused appellate advocacy. Michigan criminal appeal lawyer James Czarnecki’s work has included reversing felony convictions, securing and defending a new-trial order in a published constitutional decision, and obtaining post-conviction relief. That experience matters when a person’s freedom and future depend on identifying an error and showing why it warrants relief.
The issue that changes a case may be buried in trial testimony, revealed by a few lines in a plea transcript, or found in the legal reasoning behind a sentence. Our review examines how the case was handled, which arguments the record supports, and what procedure remains available to present them.
Below, explore the grounds that may support a Michigan criminal appeal, the deadlines that require prompt attention, and actual cases illustrating how Czarnecki’s appellate work has produced results. If you are asking whether anything more can be done by a Michigan criminal appeal lawyer, these examples can help you understand what a careful review of your own case may involve.
You can also use the following button to send an email.
Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Representation
An appellate issue may concern what happened at trial, the validity of a plea, or the sentence imposed. Our appellate and post-conviction practice includes:
- Appeals following criminal trials.
- Applications for leave to appeal after guilty or no-contest pleas.
- Sentencing challenges.
- Claims involving ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficient evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and evidentiary or constitutional error.
- Michigan Supreme Court applications.
- Motions for relief from judgment under MCR 6.500.
A concern that seems obvious to a defendant or family member still needs legal analysis. Counsel must identify the governing law, locate supporting material in the record, consider whether the issue was preserved, and explain why the requested relief follows. A significant issue may only become apparent when the transcripts, orders, and sentencing materials are examined together.
Selected Criminal Appeal Results and Appellate Work
James Czarnecki’s appellate experience includes challenges to trial convictions, guilty pleas, and sentences, as well as evidentiary hearings and post-conviction proceedings. These examples show the issues examined, the work performed, and the result at the relevant stage of each case.
People v. McClure — Three Felonious-Assault Convictions Reversed
James Czarnecki represented McClure on appeal and challenged whether the prosecution had proved the dangerous-weapon element of three felonious-assault charges. The object was a toy gun, and the evidence did not establish that it was used as a striking weapon. The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed those three convictions for insufficient evidence. The result illustrates why appellate review must examine the legal basis for each conviction separately.
People v. Gonzalez-Raymundo — New Trial Secured and Defended in a Published Constitutional Decision
James Czarnecki secured a new trial for a defendant whose ability to understand the criminal proceedings was compromised by inadequate interpretation. At an evidentiary hearing, he developed the factual record supporting relief and persuaded the trial court to order a new trial. When the prosecution appealed, Czarnecki successfully defended that victory in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
The resulting published decision, People v. Gonzalez-Raymundo, 308 Mich App 175 (2014), addressed the constitutional protections of defendants who cannot adequately understand English-language proceedings. Its significance extended beyond one client: the decision provided guidance to Michigan courts on protecting a defendant’s ability to understand and participate in a criminal trial. The case demonstrates Czarnecki’s ability to develop evidence, obtain relief in the trial court, and sustain that result through appellate advocacy.
Read the Gonzalez-Raymundo case study.
MCR 6.500 Plea Challenge — Three Convictions Vacated
In a Macomb County post-conviction matter, Czarnecki identified an error involving the original plea and sentencing proceedings. His motion for relief from judgment resulted in three drug-related convictions being vacated. He then negotiated an agreement under which the prosecution would not pursue those charges again. The case shows why the plea and sentencing transcripts can deserve renewed examination even years after judgment.
Read the HYTA plea-error case study.
People v. Mario Smith — Life-Without-Parole Sentence Vacated
Czarnecki raised and preserved a challenge to Smith’s mandatory juvenile life-without-parole sentence, arguing that Miller v. Alabama applied retroactively. After the United States Supreme Court resolved the retroactivity question in Montgomery v. Louisiana, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated Smith’s sentence and ordered resentencing in May 2016. The relief concerned the sentence; the murder conviction remained in place. This history illustrates the value of preserving a constitutional issue through further review.
Read the Smith sentencing case study.
People v. Ricardo Pena — Prosecution Confessed Error
While working in appellate attorney Gerald Lorence’s practice, Czarnecki reviewed Pena’s record, researched the law, identified issues, and drafted appellate pleadings. The appeal concerned false testimony and proceedings conducted outside the defense’s presence. The prosecution ultimately confessed error in the Michigan Court of Appeals. The case illustrates Czarnecki’s work reconstructing a complicated prosecution from the record and developing the issues for appellate review.
Read the Pena appellate case study.
People v. Beauchamp — New Trial Granted at Evidentiary Hearing and Later Reversed
Czarnecki was retained to conduct an appellate evidentiary hearing in a first-degree murder case. After that hearing, the trial court granted a new trial. During subsequent appellate proceedings handled by other counsel, the Court of Appeals reversed the new-trial order and affirmed the convictions. This example describes Czarnecki’s role in developing the record and obtaining the hearing-stage ruling, together with the later outcome.
Read the Beauchamp evidentiary-hearing case study.
Explore our criminal appeal case results for the fuller procedural histories. Every case depends on its own facts, record, and applicable law. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Discuss Whether Your Case Presents an Appellate Issue
Can You Appeal a Criminal Conviction in Michigan?
The route depends on how the case ended and which court entered the judgment. A qualifying circuit-court conviction after trial may be appealed as of right. A guilty-plea or no-contest conviction generally requires an application for leave to appeal. District-court cases follow different appellate rules.
An appeal ordinarily focuses on the existing record. If an issue requires additional facts, counsel must assess how to develop them through the appropriate procedure. The history of any earlier appeal also matters.
Learn more about applications for leave to appeal in Michigan.
For court-specific guidance, see our Michigan Court of Appeals criminal case resource, including how to find a docket, read orders, and gather records for review.
What Are Grounds for a Criminal Appeal?
Potential issues include improper admission or exclusion of evidence, constitutional violations, prosecutorial misconduct, inadequate legal representation, insufficient evidence, and sentencing errors. The existence of a mistake does not by itself establish a right to relief. Its legal significance depends on the applicable standard, preservation, and the record.
For example, if the concern is that important testimony was excluded, counsel needs to examine the proposed evidence, the objection, the judge’s ruling, and the role the evidence could have played. That analysis turns a general complaint into a specific question for review.
Our guide to grounds for a criminal appeal in Michigan explains the major categories of potential claims.
Can You Appeal After Pleading Guilty?
A guilty plea can limit the issues available for review, but it does not necessarily eliminate every challenge. An attorney may need to examine whether the plea was understanding, voluntary, and accurate, whether the agreement was followed, and whether the sentence was lawful. Some challenges require a motion in the trial court before appellate review.
The plea transcript, written agreement, sentencing transcript, and advice the defendant received can all matter. Explain whether the concern is with the decision to plead, the terms of the agreement, the sentence, or more than one of those issues.
Read Can You Appeal a Guilty Plea in Michigan?.
Can You Appeal a Criminal Sentence?
A sentence may present a distinct issue even when the conviction itself is not challenged. Potential questions include incorrect sentencing-guidelines scoring, reliance on inaccurate information or an improper factor, compliance with sentencing law, and proportionality.
The review should connect the claimed error to the sentence actually imposed and the relief requested. The sentencing transcript, presentence report, guidelines calculations, objections, and the court’s explanation are important materials to examine. The fact that a sentence feels excessive is the starting concern; the legal argument must explain why the sentence warrants relief under the governing law.
See our Michigan criminal sentence appeal guide.
What If Your Direct Appeal Has Already Ended?
A motion for relief from judgment under MCR 6.500 may provide a route to post-conviction review in some cases. Michigan’s rules restrict claims that were decided previously, claims that could have been raised earlier, and successive motions, subject to specified exceptions.
Before preparing a motion, counsel should review prior briefs, orders, and post-conviction filings along with the underlying record. Identifying a potentially serious issue is only part of the work; the claim must also fit an available procedural route.
Learn about Michigan motions for relief from judgment.
How Long Do You Have to Appeal?
Deadlines depend on the court, order, and procedure. For Court of Appeals criminal appeals of right, MCR 7.204(A)(2) includes a 42-day period and alternative triggers involving counsel and specified motions. For a defendant’s application from a final criminal judgment or order, MCR 7.205(A)(2) generally uses the later of six months after entry or 42 days after specified qualifying events. Other proceedings differ.
Contact counsel promptly with the judgment and filing history. A date cannot reliably be calculated from a general website summary alone.
Discuss Your Case and Deadline
How We Evaluate a Potential Appeal
Establish the Case History
We begin with the conviction and sentencing dates, the court involved, how the conviction occurred, and any motions or appeals already filed. This helps identify the order at issue and the procedure to evaluate.
Examine the Record
Relevant materials may include trial or plea transcripts, the sentencing transcript, exhibits, motions, orders, guidelines scoring, and earlier appellate filings. A summary from the defendant or family helps identify concerns, while the documents show what occurred in court.
Develop the Legal Argument
The review connects the facts to the governing legal standards. It asks which issues merit presentation, what additional factual development may be needed, and what remedy should be requested. Focused briefing explains why the court should grant that remedy based on the record and the law.
Explain the Available Next Step
The appropriate work may involve an appeal, an application for leave, a trial-court motion, or assessment of a post-conviction remedy. The scope of representation should identify the proceeding and work the firm will undertake.
Why Consider Czarnecki & Taylor PLLC?
Our practice includes both criminal trial work and appellate and post-conviction representation. That experience informs how we examine objections, evidentiary rulings, plea proceedings, sentencing decisions, and the procedural history of a case.
Michigan criminal appeal lawyer James Czarnecki’s work includes Michigan criminal appeals and post-conviction matters. Learn more about our attorneys and appellate practice.
An appellate consultation should help clarify what review is being considered and what materials counsel needs. We encourage prospective clients and families to explain their concerns in their own words. You do not need to identify the legal doctrine before contacting us.
Questions About Hiring a Michigan Criminal Appeal Lawyer
How Much Does a Criminal Appeal Cost?
The work required depends on the record’s length, the issues, the procedural stage, and whether additional proceedings are needed. Before retaining counsel, ask what the proposed fee covers, how transcript and other expenses will be handled, and whether a later motion or application would require a separate agreement. Contact us to discuss the scope of your matter.
What Should I Have Ready for a Consultation?
Start with the defendant’s name, court, case number if known, conviction, sentencing date, and any recent order. Tell us whether the case followed a trial or plea and whether another lawyer has handled an appeal. Bring the documents you have; you do not need to collect every transcript before making contact.
Can a Family Member Contact the Firm?
Yes. A family member can make an initial inquiry and explain where the case stands. The firm will address representation and communication arrangements with the person whose case is involved.
What Happens If an Appeal Succeeds?
The remedy depends on the issue and the court’s ruling. It may involve a new trial, resentencing, additional proceedings, or another disposition. A favorable appellate ruling does not always mean immediate release or dismissal of every charge. Ask counsel to explain both the relief requested and what would happen if it is granted.
Speak With a Michigan Criminal Appeals Lawyer
If you believe a legal error affected a conviction or sentence, contact Czarnecki & Taylor PLLC to discuss the case history and records needed for review. If sentencing or an appellate decision was recent, make that date clear when you contact us.
James Czarnecki: (586) 718-2345
59 N. Walnut Street, Suite 200, Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043
Serving clients throughout Michigan in criminal appeals, post-conviction matters, and criminal defense.
This page provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Contacting the firm does not, by itself, establish an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.